vsO

AnswerPeek vs Otterly.AI

Otterly is the cheapest way to watch AI answers — four engines from $29. AnswerPeek costs more at the agency tier and spends the difference on what you hand the client: the white-label report and the fixes.

Start free trial Run a free check

Updated July 2, 2026 · we make AnswerPeek, and this page says so plainly

Pick Otterly.AI if

You want the lowest possible entry price for solo monitoring
You need AI Overviews and Copilot coverage from day one
You want API/MCP access and a Looker Studio connector for your own reporting

Pick AnswerPeek if

The client deliverable matters more than raw engine count
You want fixes generated per brand, not URL audits to work through
You run a client roster and want white-label at $99, not custom reporting glue

Side by side, at a glance

Otterly.AI: AI search monitoring tool with the lowest entry price in the category and four engines tracked from its $29 plan.

Compare plans and features
AnswerPeek
OOtterly.AI
Starting price
$39/mo (Solo)
$29/mo (Lite, 15 prompts)
Agency-scale tier
$99/mo — white-label, ~15 client brands
$189/mo (Standard, 100 prompts) / $489/mo (Premium, 400 prompts)
AI engines tracked
ChatGPT + Perplexity, every plan
4 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot); Gemini, Claude, AI Mode as paid add-ons
White-label client reports
Not advertised
Prescriptive fixes
Content briefs, JSON-LD, placement targets
GEO URL audits with recommendations
Free check without signup
Public API
Standard and up (API + MCP), with Looker Studio connector
Free trial
7 days, no card
Yes, cancel anytime

Otterly.AI pricing from otterly.ai/pricing, as of July 2, 2026: Lite $29, Standard $189, Premium $489 monthly; annual −15%; engine add-ons $9–439/mo. AnswerPeek data from answerpeek.com/pricing. Spotted something outdated? Tell us and we'll fix it.

Where Otterly.AI genuinely wins

Entry price: $29 undercuts everyone, and it includes four engines where we include two.

AI Overviews and Copilot coverage without add-ons.

Integrations: API, MCP access and a Looker Studio connector for teams that build their own reports.

Where AnswerPeek wins

White-label client reports out of the box — Otterly's route is exporting data into your own Looker templates.

Fixes as deliverables: briefs and schema per brand, beyond URL-level audit recommendations.

Simpler agency economics: one $99 plan covers a ~15-client book; Otterly's comparable prompt volume lands at $189–489.

Questions, answered

If you are an agency selling AI visibility as a service, yes — the white-label report and generated fix lists at $99 replace the reporting work Otterly leaves to you. If you mainly need broad, cheap monitoring for your own brand, Otterly's $29 Lite plan with four engines is genuinely hard to beat.

Where the work ends. Otterly monitors more engines for less money and gives you audits, APIs and connectors to build your own reporting. AnswerPeek ends with the finished artifact: a white-label client report with a prescriptive fix list attached.

At entry, Otterly: $29 versus $39. At agency scale it flips — AnswerPeek's $99 Agency plan covers a multi-client book with white-label reports, while Otterly's higher prompt volumes run $189 to $489 and reporting is still assembled by you.

As of July 2026, Otterly's public site advertises a Looker Studio connector and API/MCP access for building custom reports, but not white-label reporting as a feature. AnswerPeek includes white-label reports from its $99 Agency plan.

CAnswerPeek vs CairrotAEO monitoring platform with API access on every plan and up to five LLMs tracked on its Pro tier.PAnswerPeek vs Peec AIBerlin-based AI search analytics platform used by 2,500+ marketing teams, strong on multi-country tracking and engine coverage.

The fastest way to compare: run your brand through both.

Our check is free and takes thirty seconds, no signup. If the answers name someone else, you'll see exactly who.

Run a free check See pricing